The abortion issue has been in the news and on my mind in recent weeks. It’s a topic that comes up often in the radio show I help produce. And after watching a lengthy interview between Mike Huckabee and Jon Stewart on The Daily Show (which can be seen in three parts, HERE, HERE, and HERE) here are my thoughts on the issue.

Nobody wants to kill babies.

There. I said it. Read the rest of this entry »

About one year ago, two teams met in the Stanley Cup Finals – the Detroit Red Wings and the Pittsburg Penguins. After six, hard-fought games, the Detroit Red Wings won the Cup. Read the rest of this entry »

I don’t think I’ve ever met anyone who is 100% satisfied with their cell phone provider. I had been happy with mine for sometime – although I’m not crazy about the phone I got – until we went over by a few minutes and were charged out the wazoo for it (”wazoo” being as descriptive as I am willing to get at this time).

Here are a few of the reasons people hate cell phone companies: Read the rest of this entry »

It has nothing to do with a disdain for Microsoft or an affinity for Matthew Perry; the reason I will never be able to use the new search engine Bing.com is because I’m immature. Read the rest of this entry »

With the preposterous suggestion that parents should be responsible for their children, 100 college presidents from around the country have proposed lowering the legal drinking age from 21 to 18. This could become a hot issue for the November election among the youth vote to see which candidate will let young college students get their drink on.
But there has been backlash from some parents and other organizations, suggesting colleges should be constantly supervising the activities of thousands of students every evening and weekend to make sure there is no under-age drinking going on.
“The administrators don’t understand that we can’t be there for our kids anymore to teach them how to be smart, responsible, law-abiding citizens,” said Louis Hice, who has two children currently attending college, both under 21. “Someone has to make sure they’re not drinking, driving, and getting embarrassing pictures of themselves posted on the facebook.com.”
With the drinking age at 21, there’s currently a three-year buffer for parents to not be accountable for their children’s drinking. Once kids turn 18 and are out of the house, it becomes the colleges’ fault if inappropriate activities go on. So if the drinking age is lowered, it could put additional burdens on parents if they had no one else to blame.
If the drinking age is lowered, it is possible that parents would be responsible to raise their children in such a way that if they chose to drink, they would do so responsibly. It would require parents to set a good example. It might even force parents to be more involved in their children’s lives – they would have to know where their kids were, what they were doing, and who they were doing it with.
“We just don’t have time for any of that anymore,” said Karrie Jowers, a member of Parents Against Drunk Driving. “I’ve got neighbors to compete with and spin classes to go to. I can’t be expected to teach my children to obey the law and be responsible adults. That’s what school, church and government are for anyway.”
These 18 to 21 aged children are in a unique demographic. By many counts, they are adults. Most have left the nest and are living on their own. They can vote, smoke, and enlist in the military. But they still can’t gamble, drink alcohol, or rent a car.
So university presidents are trying to lower the drinking age in order to better define that transition into adulthood, and as protection from any possible liability.
“The best way to fix a nationwide epidemic of alcohol poisoning, binge drinking, death, and disease is to make it legal,” said Ralph Pinney, president of Arcanta University. “By simply getting rid of the law, under-age drinking would no longer exist. Eighteen-year-olds would no longer be under age, so it would just be called ‘drinking’ – which everyone is okay with.”
But many students worry they wouldn’t know who to blame for their inebriation if the drinking age were lowered.
“Someone has to take care of us. Our parents are back at home, miles away. So the school has got to do it,” said Jeni Sanders, a senior at Dantel State College. She added that, come November, she would vote for whatever candidate promised to keep the drinking age at 21. Note

Note to reader: Looking for something else altogether, I recently came across this satire article I wrote several months ago for a particular Web site. It was never published, so I am including it’s barely-adjusted version here.

With the preposterous suggestion that parents should be responsible for their children, 100 college presidents from around the country have proposed lowering the legal drinking age from 21 to 18. This is a hot issue for young people who want to get their drink on. Read the rest of this entry »

In my various rants, I have accused many things of destroying America – namely cell phones, texting, and 24-hour news. But this time I’m especially confident in my accusation; American Idol is destroying America. Read the rest of this entry »

On May 7th, on this very blog, I wrote a post about how members of Congress get paid ridiculous salaries.

In passing, I mentioned the idea of writing my Congressman and addressing this issue. I said, “I’m not really sure what to do about this … I mean, I know in principle how I would do it - I would write my Congressman (and never hear back) …” Read the rest of this entry »

My day job involves a lot of writing and editing. The people I work with, while very talented and intelligent people, know little about the rules of grammar. Because of this, I frequently – and gladly – explain some of the nuances of grammar to them. Doing so has brought three grammatical qualms of mine to the forefront, each having to do with the evolution of grammar, punctuation, and language. Read the rest of this entry »

My latest article to be featured on Demockracy.com can be read HERE.

This morning at the radio show I help produce, the idea was brought up that the annual salaries of U.S. politicians – specifically those in Congress – should equal the national average income. The idea is that as the national income went up, these politicians’ salaries would also increase; and as national salaries decreased, so it would be for politicians.

If this were implemented, the current annual salaries for members of Congress would drop from $174,000 to about $50,000. Read the rest of this entry »

 

July 2009
S M T W T F S
« Jun    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Blog Stats

  • 16,914 Wastes of Time